Another crackdown! Two Chinese giants were blacklisted by the United States. The Chinese Embassy responded!, Intelligent conference room, airplay
according to the official website of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), on March 25 local time, the Federal Communications Commission listed Kaspersky, and in the list of” and services that pose a threat to the national security of the United States “.
and
in view of the latest situation, the reporter of times · e company contacted China Telecom and China Mobile, but has not received a reply yet.
and
the FCC re sealed the
and
of Chinese enterprises. It is reported that according to the law promulgated by the FCC in 2019 to protect the security of American communication networks, the companies on the list are identified as a threat to the national communication security of the United States.
and
last June, the FCC voted to pass a ban on the use of equipment from Listed Companies in U.S. telecommunications networks. Last October, the US Senate asked the FCC not to issue new equipment licenses to listed companies.
(source: FCC)
at present, there are many companies in the list, including Ao Kaspersky Lab, China Mobile International USA Inc. and China Telecom (America) Corp. listed today, as well as Huawei, ZTE,, and Huawei listed on March 12 last year.
and
Russian Kaspersky laboratory responded in a statement that it was disappointed with the FCC’s decision and stated that the US decision was “made on political grounds”, which was “groundless and a response to the geopolitical climate, rather than a comprehensive assessment of the integrity of Kaspersky’s products and services”.
private placement, clearance, position increase, phase of sentient beings, A-share, time, market fluctuation, position reduction, representative, since this year,
had just decided to revoke the 214 licenses of CITIC International’s ComNet (USA) LLC and Pacific networks Corp. on March 16 on the grounds of national security. Moreover, the FCC also rejected the application to conduct business in the United States in 2019 on the same ground that “it may seriously endanger the national security of the United States”.
and
it is understood that the 214 License refers to the authorization of international telecommunications business issued by the FCC in accordance with Article 214 of the U.S. Communications Act. If the company does not have a 214 license, it cannot operate in the United States.
last week, the 214 license of China Network Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary ComNet was also revoked by the FCC. Gao Feng, a spokesman for the Ministry of Commerce, said that the United States should immediately stop the unreasonable suppression of Chinese enterprises, immediately stop the wrong practice of politicizing economic and trade issues, and create a fair and stable market environment for enterprises of all countries, including Chinese enterprises, to operate in the United States. China will take necessary measures to resolutely safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises. The companies involved in
and
responded that
and
were listed in the “list” of China Mobile. The reporter tried to contact the two companies, but there was no response at present.
according to foreign media reports quoted by globegroup.com, in response to the frequent and unreasonable suppression of Chinese enterprises by the United States, the Chinese Embassy in Washington responded on Friday: “the FCC abused state power and maliciously attacked Chinese telecom operators again without factual basis. The United States should immediately stop the unreasonable suppression of Chinese enterprises. China will take necessary measures to resolutely safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises.” China’s Ministry of Commerce spokesman Gao Feng also said last week that the United States continues to generalize the concept of national security, abuse national power, maliciously suppress Chinese telecom enterprises in the absence of factual basis, violate the most basic principles of non discrimination and fair competition, violate recognized international economic and trade rules, disrupt the normal market order, and damage the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises and consumers, including American users, China firmly opposes this. Gao Feng stressed: “the US side should immediately stop the unreasonable crackdown on Chinese enterprises, immediately stop the wrong practice of politicizing economic and trade issues, and create a fair and stable market environment for enterprises of all countries, including Chinese enterprises, to operate in the United States. China will take necessary measures to resolutely safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises.”
and
have previously refuted and responded to Chinese enterprises that were included in the FCC ban last year:
and
Huawei spokesman said in an email that the measures proposed by the FCC “are misleading and unnecessarily punitive”, and based on “predictive judgment”, it is lack of legal basis and discriminatory to prevent the purchase of equipment related to (specific) country of origin or brand, It does nothing to protect the integrity of the U.S. communication network or supply chain.
and
Hikvision said in an email that its threat was groundless and “strongly opposed” the practice of the Federal Communications Commission. In addition, Hikvision also responded at the investor meeting that Hikvision’s revenue in the United States accounted for a small proportion, and even if the new products did not obtain FCC certification, it would not affect the fundamental.
and
UOB said that the company “is not right and has never posed any kind of threat to us national security”, and the practice of the Federal Communications Commission was “groundless”.
and
hytera said that its products “will not pose any threat to the national security of any country”, and said the move of the Federal Communications Commission was inconsistent with the standard practice of the U.S. government in assessing and mitigating risks.
last October, the FCC cancelled China Telecom’s 214 license in the United States. At that time, Shu jueteng, spokesman of the Ministry of Commerce, said that the US move generalized the concept of national security, abused national power, maliciously suppressed Chinese enterprises in the absence of factual basis, violated market principles and damaged the atmosphere of bilateral cooperation. China expressed serious concern about this. Shu jueteng stressed that the Chinese economic and trade team has made solemn representations to the US side in this regard. The US side should immediately correct its erroneous practices and provide a fair, open, fair and non discriminatory business environment for enterprises investing and operating in the United States.
and
the Ministry of industry and information technology pointed out that the US side only relied on subjective speculation andSuspecting that China Telecom’s 214 license will be revoked is not in line with the image of the United States as a market-oriented country, but also damages the legitimate rights and interests of global consumers, including American users. In recent years, the US side has repeatedly sanctioned Chinese enterprises on the grounds of national security, ignoring the facts. This is an unreasonable crackdown on Chinese enterprises by abusing state power and a serious damage to international economic and trade rules. The Ministry of industry and information technology of
and
urged the United States to treat Chinese telecom enterprises with a fair and non discriminatory attitude, stop the wrong practice of generalizing the concept of national security and politicizing economic issues, and provide a fair, just and non discriminatory environment for Chinese enterprises to invest and operate in the United States.
(source: Securities Times)